Comprises a violation of article 58.2 of the Workers’ Statute. In this way, the Supreme Court alleges that the purpose of the date appearing in the reprimand document is none other than that the worker knows the moment in which the application of his punishment begins. And, therefore, the date on which said punishment will expire. Other similar rulings on the validity.

Than Those Include in the Spanish

Omission of the effective date The Supreme Court ruling mentione above is the most recent, but not the only one that has denie the Bulk SMS China validity of these documents due to the non-inclusion of the effective date. In 2001, the April 28 judgment of the Seville Court stipulate that the effective date that is include in a sanction letter is a formal requirement.

Claim Them Through the Courts

This court also adds that the formal requirements are intende to provide a series of guarantees. Thus, it is recognize that in a BLB Directory sanctioning document in which there is no date of application, the right itself cannot even be recognize. Therefore, the Sevillian court considere null and void any reprimand include in a letter in which there is no effective date for not complying with the necessary guarantees.